Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Practicing Social Media Fiqh: Motives and Forms of Digital Activism among Santri in Advocating Marginalized Communities and Environmental Issues

Abstract

The rapid mediatization of Islam has shifted religious authority from traditional physical pulpits to digital screens, prompting traditional santri (boarding school students) to engage as active digital agents. This qualitative case study investigates how students at Pondok Pesantren Darussalam Ciamis, West Java, negotiate and practice digital activism on social media to advocate for marginalized communities and environmental issues. Drawing on in-depth interviews and field observations, we find that santri activism is driven by profound empathy and a holistic theological synthesis that merges personal piety with social responsibility. The students employ diverse creative forms, including short educational videos, visual infographics, respectful narrative storytelling, and online-to-offline community mobilization. In navigating the ethical hazards of the online attention economy, they practice a lived social media fiqh by deliberately slowing down to apply tabayyun (verification) and prioritizing maslahah (public benefit) over algorithmic reach, while actively preserving human dignity (ḥifẓ al-ʿirḍ) to avoid exploitative representations. Ultimately, this study contributes to bridging the empirical deficit in digital religion studies by demonstrating how traditional jurisprudence operates on the ground, establishing a hybrid framework of "Digital Fiqh Governance" as an ethical compass for contemporary digital spaces.

PDF

References

  1. Ab Rashid, R., Al-Ramahi, R., Al-Smaihyeen, M., & Al-Smadi, O. A. (2026). Discursive Identities of Non-Hijabi Muslim Jordanian Women. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2026.2623238
  2. Abdoul-Hamid, O., Mohd Yusof Wan Chik, W., & Iqbal Mohd Fadzli, A. (2026). The Similarity between Ijtihad, Qiyas, and Taʿlīl: A Foundational Study in Light of the Objectives of Shariʿah. Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 31(1), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol31no1.755
  3. Ahmed, H. (2025). Islamic Normative Legal Theory: Framework and Applications. Journal of Law and Religion. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2025.10056
  4. Ali, A. M. M., & Aljahsh, M. A. I. (2025). The Proliferation of Anomalous Digital Fatwas: A Critical Examination of Jurisprudential Challenges and Societal Impacts in the Digital Age. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 25(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v25i1.37905
  5. Anita, T. L., Sarastiani, A., Wijaya, L., Hazah, M. Z., & Rahim, H. (2025). The Role of Islamic Mobile Apps in Enhancing Religious Practices among Gen Z in Jakarta. Proceedings - 2025 10th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for the Muslim World, ICT4M 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT4M68001.2025.11363491
  6. As’adi, M. H. (2026). Ideological Plurality and Misinformation Dynamics in Indonesia’s Digital Islamic Sphere. Contemporary Islam. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-026-00620-8
  7. Astuti, Y. D., & Attaymini, R. (2026). Unveiling Digital Literacy and Novel Patterns of Information Access among Indonesian Female Millennial Muslims. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 42(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2026-4201-05
  8. Baedah, S. S. A., & Musolin, M. H. (2026). Dialectics of Fiqh al-Ikhtilāf: A Comparative Madhhab Analysis of Legal Pluralism in Contemporary Muslim Societies. Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab, 8(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.64995
  9. Campbell, H. A. (2017). Surveying Theoretical Approaches within Digital Religion Studies. New Media and Society, 19(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816649912
  10. Ferenc, R. (2026). Religion and Ethics - A Dual Compass in the Age of AI. Informacios Tarsadalom, 26(2), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.22503/inftars.XXVI.2026.2.5
  11. Hartono, T., Mutia, T., & Trisakti, F. A. (2025). Social Media and New Patterns of Religiousness among Urban Millenial Muslim in Indonesia. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025285
  12. Ilham, M., Darwis, M., Munir, A., & Hasanuddin, M. I. (2026). Between Ḥifẓ al-ʿIrḍ (the Protection of Dignity) and Algorithmic Visibility: A Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah Approach to Digital Modesty in the Age of Self-Commodification. Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab, 8(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.64536
  13. Kannike, U. M. M., & Fahm, A. O. (2025). Exploring the Ethical Governance of Artificial Intelligence from an Islamic Ethical Perspective. Jurnal Fiqh, 22(1), 134–161. https://doi.org/10.22452/fiqh.vol22no1.5
  14. Lohlker, R., & Wahid, S. H. (2026). The Transformation of Islamic Religious Authority. Religions, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17040493
  15. Lokman, M. A. A., Noor, M. M., Nadzli, N. S. M., Suyurno, S., Harun, M. S., & Kayadibi, S. (2026). Applying Al-Ta’lil bi Al-Hikmah to Social Media Use: A Complementary to the Maqasid Shariah Approach in Islamic Digital Ethics. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 25(1), 291–324. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol25.iss1.art8
  16. Lubis, I., Parinduri, H., Lubis, D. I. S., & Lubis, A. H. (2026). Islamic Legal Thought as an Integrative System: Ontological, Epistemological, and Axiological Analysis in the Discourse of Ius Integrum Nusantara. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 26(1), 138–164. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v26i1.34261
  17. Maulana, A. M. R., Rachmawati, F., & Mulya, A. S. (2026). From Digital Religion to Digital Islam: Finding God in the Society 5.0 through Maqāsīd Sharī’ah. Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 11(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v11i1.11066
  18. Müller, J., & Friemel, T. N. (2024). Dynamics of Digital Media Use in Religious Communities—A Theoretical Model. Religions, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15070762
  19. Qaruty, R. A., Abokhoza, R., Albert, A., Al-Tkhayneh, K. M., & Hadi, S. A. (2025). Islamic Ethical Frameworks for Privacy, Security, and Trust in Digital Social Networks: A Jurisprudential Perspective. International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security, SNAMS, 2025, 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1109/SNAMS67467.2025.11390891
  20. Ridzuan, M. A. M., Razak, M. I. A., Hassan, P., Salleh, M. Y. Y., & Rahman, M. F. A. (2025). The Theoretical Framework of the Model for Delivering Legal Rulings in the Religious Q&A Segments of Mass Media in Malaysia. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 220–235. https://doi.org/10.7187/GJATSI112025-14
  21. Siregar, M. H., Nofri Andy, N., Abdurrahman, Z., & Kamal, M. (2025). Digital Fiqh and Ethical Governance: Negotiating Islamic Normativity and Online Narcissism in Contemporary Indonesia. Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah, 24(1), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v24i1.13218
  22. Wahid, S. H. (2024). Exploring the Intersection of Islam and Digital Technology: A Bibliometric Analysis. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101085
  23. Wahid, S. H., & Abdulloh, S. (2026). Digital Islamic Authority: A Revolutionary Shift or Mere Hype? A Systematic Review. SN Social Sciences, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-026-01328-5