Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

“Equal access” Without “Establishing” Religion: The Necessity for Assessing Social Perspective-Taking Skills and Institutional Atmosphere

Abstract

We concur  that in public high schools there should be unimpeded religious freedom if an empirical assessment shows students have the proficiency to evaluate and freely choose religious systems and practices and to discern attempts by authorities to establish a religion. We differ with Moshman,however, regarding (a) the relative importance of a school's ethical, moral and political climate in influencing the exercise of free religious and political choice; (b) his focus on religious over political freedoms; (c) what kinds of proficiencies need to be assessed; (d) how to assess these proficiencies; (e) his claim that that the reasoning ability of high school and college students is similar; and (f) the manner in which decisions permitting religious clubs in high schools should be made. Reasoning proficiency must be assessed in high school, as well as post-high school, populations of students, teachers, and administrators using a social perspective-taking task with establishment of a religion content. A school's institutional atmosphere must be assessed.

PDF

References

  1. D. Moshman
  2. Equal access for religion in public schools? An empirical solution to a legal dilemma
  3. Developmental Review
  4. (1990)
  5. P.K. Arlin
  6. Cognitive development in adulthood: A fifth stage?
  7. Developmental Psychology
  8. (1975)
  9. C. Armon
  10. Ideals of the good life: A cross-sectional/longitudinal study of evaluative reasoning in children and adults
  11. (1984)
  12. W.M. Bart et al.
  13. Generalizability of the ordering among five formal reasoning tasks by an Ordering-Theoretic Method
  14. Child Study Journal
  15. (1979)
  16. A. Colby et al.
  17. M.L. Commons et al.
  18. Postformal adult cognition: A multidomain study
  19. M.L. Commons et al.
  20. The relationship between Piagetian and Kohlbergian stage: An examination of the “necessary but not sufficient relationship”
  21. M.L. Commons et al.
  22. A general model of stage theory
  23. A. Higgins et al.
  24. The relationship of moral atmosphere to judgment of responsibility
  25. B. Inhelder et al.
  26. L. Kohlberg
  27. Which postformal levels are stages?