Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2023)
Education and Social Studies

Articles

Locating the Feminist Scholar: Relational Empowerment and Social Activism

Published 2024-08-25

  • Madine VanderPlaat

Madine VanderPlaat
Saint Mary’s University in Halifax, Nova Scotia

Abstract

Over the past decade, the rhetoric of “empowerment” has permeated the health promotion, education, and social welfare literature. Many scholars and professionals, particularly those active in the field of social intervention and community development, have found themselves struggling for location in the emancipatory process. This struggle often is characterized by a profound self-consciousness of privilege and the fear of being perceived as imposing and manipulative. This article explores the tensions inherent in the role of the scholar/activist using illustrations from the author’s experience as principal investigator of the Atlantic Regional Evaluation of the Community Action Program for Children. In so doing, it discusses the importance of a relational approach to empowerment, one characterized by mutuality. A commitment to mutuality is seen as a key factor in enhancing the emancipatory capacities of empowerment-based research projects.

PDF

References

  1. Barr, D., & Cochran, M. (1992, June). Understanding and supporting empowerment: Redefining the professional role. Networking Bulletin: Empowerment and Family Support, pp. 2-8.
  2. Google Scholar
  3. Benhabib, S. (1986). Critique, norm, and utopia: A study of the foundation of critical theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
  4. Google Scholar
  5. Bernstein, R. J. (1992). The new constellation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  6. Google Scholar
  7. Bové, P. A. (1986). Intellectuals in power: A genealogy of critical humanism. New York: Columbia University Press.
  8. Google Scholar
  9. Burke, W. W. (1986). Leadership as empowering others. In S. Srivastva (Ed.), Executive power (pp. 51-77). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  10. Google Scholar
  11. Coll, C. G., Cook-Nobles, R., & Surrey, J. L. (1993). Building connection through diversity (Work in Progress No. 54). Wellesley, MA: Stone Center.
  12. Google Scholar
  13. Collins, M. (1991). Adult education as vocation. New York: Routledge.
  14. Google Scholar
  15. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 15, 471-482.
  16. Google Scholar
  17. Dunst, C. J., & Trivette, C. M. (1987). Enabling and empowering families: Conceptual and intervention issues. School Psychology Review, 16, 443-456.
  18. Google Scholar
  19. Eagleton, T. (1994). Ideology. New York: Longman.
  20. Google Scholar
  21. Fay, B. (1987). Critical social science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  22. Google Scholar
  23. Fedele, N. M., & Harrington, E. (1990). Women’s groups: How connections heal (Work in Progress No. 47). Wellesley, MA: Stone Center.
  24. Google Scholar
  25. Felski, R. (1989). Beyond feminist aesthetics: Feminist literature and social change. London: Radius.
  26. Google Scholar
  27. Fine, M. (1994). Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 70-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  28. Google Scholar
  29. Forester, J. (1988). Critical theory and planning practice. In J. Forester (Ed.), Critical theory and public life (pp. 202-227). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  30. Google Scholar
  31. Foucault, M. (1977). Power/knowledge (C. Gordon, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.
  32. Google Scholar
  33. Fraser, N. (1989). Unruly practices: Power, discourse, and gender in contemporary theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  34. Google Scholar
  35. Giroux, H. A. (1988). Literacy and the pedagogy of voice and political empowerment. Educational Theory, 38(1), 61-75.
  36. Google Scholar
  37. Giroux, H. A. (1991). Modernism, postmodernism, and feminism: Rethinking the boundaries of educational discourse. In H. A. Giroux (Ed.), Postmodernism, feminism, and cultural politics (pp. 1-59). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  38. Google Scholar
  39. Gore, J. (1992). What we can do for you! What can “we” do for “you”? Struggling over empowerment in critical and feminist pedagogy. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 55-73). New York: Routledge.
  40. Google Scholar
  41. Habermas, J. (1974). Communication and the evolution of society. Boston: Beacon.
  42. Google Scholar
  43. Habermas, J. (1976). Legitimation crisis. London: Heineman.
  44. Google Scholar
  45. Hart, M. (1989). Critical theory and beyond: Further perspectives on emancipatory education. Adult Education Quarterly, 40(3), 125-138.
  46. Google Scholar
  47. Jordan, J. V. (1990). Courage in connection: Conflict, compassion, and creativity (Work in Progress No. 45). Wellesley, MA: Stone Center.